Behind the controversial new no-phone policy

Dean of Students Ms. Swain shares her philosophy that led to this rule.

Illustration by Lauren Chan

Upon the arrival of the new school year, Middlesex students were met by an unexpected change: phones are now no longer allowed during the school day. Many students–notably returners–have voiced frustration, protesting that the restriction complicates communication and school life; many wonder how this policy will align with the needs and routines of students who have already grown accustomed to relying on their devices. In an interview with Ms. Swain, the initiative's key advocate, she declares that this change isn’t about demonizing and restricting technology, but rather about encouraging students to be more involved in their day-to-day interactions. 

The idea for this policy came after Ms. Swain read The Anxious Generation by Jonathan Haidt, a book that investigates the plummet of mental health among teenagers in our era of smartphones and social media. She noted that platforms like TikTok, Instagram, and Facebook have built-in mechanisms designed to lure teenagers into an endless abyss of social comparisons and peer pressure. The like button in particular hijacks self esteem by creating a craving for social dopamine reinforcements that can exacerbate social anxiety. Teenagers, who are already undergoing a critical stage of forming their identities, are especially vulnerable to this effect. 

“The smartphone is like the Apple of Eden,” Ms. Swain remarked gravely, “great kids make big mistakes on their phones all the time.”

However, contrary to what students assume, this rule is not a harsh “phone ban.” Ms. Swain was quick to clarify that the school is not aiming to call for punitive measures against students. “One important decision we made was not tying this policy to a disciplinary response,” she said. Indeed, the school hopes to work in collaboration with students to engage with the policy as a learning opportunity. Rather than punishing students for breaking rules, this policy seeks more to help students recognize the importance of balance in their use of technology. 

In terms of potential impacts of this decision, Ms. Swain hopes to see a decrease in discipline matters relating to cyber-bullying, more engagement in class, and a greater sense of connection in common areas. Now, without phones as a back-up plan during awkward moments, Ms. Swain sees this as an opportunity to encourage students to “take risks” by sitting next to a person that they don’t really talk to, building new friendships, or just being present. Social dynamics during non-school hours may also improve, as students reclaim their social lives in meaningful ways instead of retreating to their phones. 

That said, the no-phone policy is still subject to adjustments as to whether to push further or to scale down based on feedback from students. Though phones and social media are now integral parts of our lives, it may be worth taking a step backward to consider our place in a society consumed by personal devices. While it is too early to call the policy a success, Middlesex is taking a bold step towards fostering a more engaged and mindful community.

Jessica Wu